Evaluating the effectiveness of e‐cigarettes compared with usual care for smoking cessation when offered to smokers at homeless centres: Protocol for a multi‐centre cluster randomised controlled trial in Great Britain
Cox, S., Bauld, Linda, Brown, R., Carlise, M., Ford, A., Hajek, P., Li, J., Notley, C., Parrott, S., Pesola, F., Robson, D., Soar, K., Tyler, A., Ward, E. and Dawkins, L. (2022). Evaluating the effectiveness of e‐cigarettes compared with usual care for smoking cessation when offered to smokers at homeless centres: Protocol for a multi‐centre cluster randomised controlled trial in Great Britain. Addiction (Abingdon, England). https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15851
|Authors||Cox, S., Bauld, Linda, Brown, R., Carlise, M., Ford, A., Hajek, P., Li, J., Notley, C., Parrott, S., Pesola, F., Robson, D., Soar, K., Tyler, A., Ward, E. and Dawkins, L.|
Background and aims: Smoking is extremely common among adults experiencing homelessness but there is lack of evidence for treatment efficacy. E-cigarettes are an effective quit aid, but they have not been widely tested in smokers with complex health and social needs. Here we build on our cluster feasibility trial and evaluate the offer of an e-cigarette or usual care to smokers accessing a homeless centre.
Design: Multi-centre two-arm cluster randomised controlled trial with mixed-method embedded process and economic evaluation.
Setting: Homeless centres in England, Scotland and Wales.
Participants: Adult smokers (18+ years; n= 480) accessing homeless centres and who are known to centre staff and willing to consent.
Intervention and comparator: Clusters (n=32) will be randomised to either an e-cigarette starter pack with weekly allocations of nicotine containing e-liquid for 4-weeks (choice of flavours (menthol, fruit and tobacco) and strengths 12 mg/mL and 18mg/mL), or the usual care intervention which comprises very brief advice and a leaflet signposting to the local stop smoking service.
Measurements: The primary outcome is 24-week sustained CO validated smoking cessation (Russell Standard defined, intention-to-treat analysis). Secondary outcomes: i) Fifty percent smoking reduction (cigarettes per day) from baseline to 24 weeks; ii) 7-day point prevalence quit rates at 4-, 12- and 24-week follow-up; iii) changes in risky smoking practices (e.g. sharing cigarettes, smoking discarded cigarettes) from baseline to 4-, 12- and 24-weeks; iv) cost-effectiveness of the intervention; v) fidelity of intervention implementation; mechanisms of change; contextual influences and sustainability.
Comments: This is the first study to randomly assign smokers experiencing homelessness to an e-cigarette and usual care intervention to measure smoking abstinence with embedded process and economic evaluations. If effective, the results will be used to inform the larger scale implementation of offering e-cigarettes across homeless centres to aid smoking cessation.
|Keywords||Psychiatry and Mental health; Medicine (miscellaneous)|
|Journal||Addiction (Abingdon, England)|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1111/add.15851|
|Online||22 Feb 2022|
|Publication process dates|
|Accepted||09 Feb 2022|
|Deposited||18 Feb 2022|
|Accepted author manuscript|
File Access Level
This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Evaluating the effectiveness of e-cigarettes compared with usual care for smoking cessation when offered to smokers at homeless centres: Protocol for a multi-centre cluster randomised controlled trial in Great Britain , which has been published in final form at [Link to final article using the DOI]. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited.
0views this month
0downloads this month