Mental Reinstatement of Context: Do individual differences in mental time travel and eyewitness occupation influence eyewitness performance over different delay intervals?
Journal article
Bangs, K. and Smith-Spark, J. (2019). Mental Reinstatement of Context: Do individual differences in mental time travel and eyewitness occupation influence eyewitness performance over different delay intervals? Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling. https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1536
Authors | Bangs, K. and Smith-Spark, J. |
---|---|
Abstract | The Cognitive Interview is a memory-enhancing interview protocol designed to optimize the access and retrieval of eyewitness memories. Its Mental Reinstatement of Context (MRC) component requires interviewees to mentally reconstruct the crime event they witnessed. Individual differences in mental time travel (MTT) relate to the extent to which a person mentally re-experiences personal events from his or her past. Individual differences in MTT have been found to predict correct recall of a simulated crime event under immediate MRC recall conditions. To explore the relationship between MTT and performance under MRC conditions further, the present study presented a simulated crime video to 30 police officers and 26 members of the public. Eyewitness recall was tested under MRC conditions either immediately or one week later. Participants’ general MTT and also MTT relating specifically to the crime video itself was measured via self-report. Less correct information and more confabulations were produced after one week but delay had no effect on the amount of incorrect information reported. No difference in recall was found between police officers and members of the public. Better quality MTT relating to the crime video was found to be a positive predictor of the amount of information correctly recalled under immediate conditions but not after one week. General MTT scores did not predict correct recall under either delay condition. Interviewers need to be aware that, due to individual differences, some witnesses may perform better under the MRC component than others. |
Year | 2019 |
Journal | Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling |
ISSN | 1544-4767 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1002/jip.1536 |
Publication dates | |
Online | 29 Aug 2019 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 29 Jul 2019 |
Deposited | 06 Sep 2019 |
Accepted author manuscript | License File Access Level Open |
https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/87zv1
Download files
Accepted author manuscript
Bangs & Smith-Spark JIP&OP_manuscript for ResearchGate (1).pdf | ||
License: CC BY 4.0 | ||
File access level: Open |
169
total views189
total downloads5
views this month1
downloads this month