Parental Responsibilities and Moral Status
Blackshaw, BP and Rodger, Daniel (2020). Parental Responsibilities and Moral Status. Journal of Medical Ethics.
|Authors||Blackshaw, BP and Rodger, Daniel|
Prabhpal Singh has recently defended a relational account of the difference in moral status between fetuses and newborns as a way of explaining why abortion is permissible and infanticide is not. He claims that only a newborn can stand in a parent-child relation, not a fetus, and this relation has a moral dimension that bestows moral value. We challenge Singh's reasoning, arguing that the case he presents is unconvincing. We suggest that the parent-child relation is better understood as an extension of an existing relationship formed during the gestational period. The change in this relation at birth is not sufficient to justify the radical change in moral status required to rule out infanticide while accepting the permissibility of abortion. Given that the moral status of orphans is also problematic under Singh's account, we conclude that Singh has not shown that a newborn has greater moral worth than a fetus.
|Keywords||Moral Status; Infanticide; Relationships|
|Journal||Journal of Medical Ethics|
|Publisher||BMJ Publishing Group|
|Publication process dates|
|Accepted||15 Mar 2020|
|Deposited||19 Mar 2020|
|Accepted author manuscript|
CC BY-NC 4.0
File Access Level
Accepted author manuscript
0views this month
0downloads this month