Using animal-derived constituents in anaesthesia and surgery: the case for disclosing to patients

Journal article


Rodger, D and Blackshaw, B (2019). Using animal-derived constituents in anaesthesia and surgery: the case for disclosing to patients. BMC Medical Ethics. 20 (14).
AuthorsRodger, D and Blackshaw, B
Abstract

Background
Animal-derived constituents are frequently used in anaesthesia and surgery, and patients are seldom informed of this. This is problematic for a growing minority of patients who may have religious or secular concerns about their use in their care. It is not currently common practice to inform patients about the use of animal-derived constituents, yet what little empirical data does exist indicates that many patients want the opportunity to give their informed consent.

Discussion
First we review the nature and scale of the problem by looking at the groups who may have concerns about the use of animal-derived constituents in their care. We then summarise some of the products used in anaesthesia and surgery that can contain such constituents, such as anaesthetic drugs, surgical implants and dressings. Finally, we explore the problem of animal-derived constituents and consent using Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles approach, examining issues of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence and justice.

Summary
Disclosing the use of animal-derived constituents in anaesthesia and surgery is warranted under Beauchamp and Childress’ four principles approach to the problem. Although there exist systemic and practical challenges to implementing this in practice, the ethical case for doing so is strong. The Montgomery ruling presents additional legal reason for disclosure because it entails that patients must be made aware of risks associated with their treatment that they attach significance to.

KeywordsSurgery; Anaesthesia; Medical Ethics; Animal rights; Autonomy; Consent; Veganism; Religion
Year2019
JournalBMC Medical Ethics
Journal citation20 (14)
PublisherBMC
ISSN1472-6939
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1186/s12910-019-0351-4
Publication dates
Print18 Feb 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited11 Feb 2019
Accepted13 Feb 2019
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY 4.0
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/86792

  • 24
    total views
  • 29
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Related outputs

Surgical fires: still a burning issue in England and Wales
Rodger, D (2019). Surgical fires: still a burning issue in England and Wales. Journal of Perioperative Practice.
The impact of stigma on the care of postpartum women with severe mental illness
Rodger, D (2019). The impact of stigma on the care of postpartum women with severe mental illness. Evidence-Based Nursing.
Students’ perceptions of debating as a learning strategy: A qualitative study
Rodger, D. and Stewart-Lord, A. (2019). Students’ perceptions of debating as a learning strategy: A qualitative study. Nurse Education in Practice.
Meeting the Epicurean Challenge: A Reply to Christensen
Blackshaw, B and Rodger, D (2019). Meeting the Epicurean Challenge: A Reply to Christensen. Journal of Medical Ethics.
Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen
Blackshaw, B and Rodger, D (2019). Why a right to life rules out infanticide: A final reply to Räsänen. Bioethics.
The aftermath of a perioperative death: who cares for the clinician?
Rodger, D and Hartley, H (2018). The aftermath of a perioperative death: who cares for the clinician? Evidence-Based Nursing.
Book Review: Down's Syndrome Screening and Reproductive Politics: Care, choice, and disability in the prenatal clinic.
Rodger, D (2018). Book Review: Down's Syndrome Screening and Reproductive Politics: Care, choice, and disability in the prenatal clinic. The New Bioethics. 24 (1), pp. 95-97.
Beyond infanticide: How psychological accounts of persons justify harming infants
Rodger, D, Blackshaw, B and Miller, C (2018). Beyond infanticide: How psychological accounts of persons justify harming infants. The New Bioethics.
How to mitigate the effects of peri-operative death on nursing staff
Rodger, D and Atwal, A (2018). How to mitigate the effects of peri-operative death on nursing staff. Nursing Times. 114 (8), pp. 26-29.
Moral distress in healthcare assistants: an overview with recommendations
Rodger, D (2018). Moral distress in healthcare assistants: an overview with recommendations. Nursing Ethics.
Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus
Blackshaw, BP and Rodger, D (2018). Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus. Bioethics.
Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing - a reply to Joona Räsänen
Rodger, D (2018). Why arguments against infanticide remain convincing - a reply to Joona Räsänen. Bioethics.
An introduction to ethical theory for healthcare assistants
Rodger, D and Blackshaw, B (2017). An introduction to ethical theory for healthcare assistants. British Journal of Healthcare Assistants. 11 (11), pp. 556-561.
Extravasation injury leading to acute compartment syndrome in a child: the vital role of pulse oximetry in early detection and management
Rodger, D (2018). Extravasation injury leading to acute compartment syndrome in a child: the vital role of pulse oximetry in early detection and management. Journal of Perioperative Practice. 28 (4), pp. 95-98.
From healthcare assistant to student operating department practitioner—are you ready for the ODP challenge?
Rodger, D and Mahoney, C (2017). From healthcare assistant to student operating department practitioner—are you ready for the ODP challenge? British Journal of Healthcare Assistants. 11 (5), pp. 248-251.