Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus
Rodger, D and Blackshaw, BP (2018). Ectogenesis and the case against the right to the death of the foetus. Bioethics.
|Authors||Rodger, D and Blackshaw, BP|
Ectogenesis, or the use of artificial wombs to allow a foetus to develop, will likely become a reality within a few decades, and could significantly affect the abortion debate. We first examine the implications for Judith Jarvis Thomson’s violinist analogy, which argues for a woman’s right to withdraw life support from the foetus and so terminate her pregnancy, even if the foetus is granted full moral status. We show that on Thomson’s reasoning, there is no right to the death of the foetus, and abortion is not permissible if ectogenesis is available, provided it is safe and inexpensive. This raises the question of whether there are persuasive reasons for the right to the death of the foetus that could be exercised in the context of ectogenesis. Eric Mathison and Jeremy Davis have examined several arguments for this right, doubting that it exists, while Joona Räsänen has recently criticized their reasoning. We respond to Räsänen’s analysis, concluding that his arguments are unsuccessful, and that there is no right to the death of the foetus in these circumstances.
|Keywords||Ectogenesis; Foetus; Moral Status; Pregnancy; 2201 Applied Ethics; 2203 Philosophy; Applied Ethics|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||doi:10.1111/bioe.12529|
|20 Oct 2018|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||16 Aug 2018|
|Accepted||14 Aug 2018|
|Accepted author manuscript|
CC BY 4.0
Accepted author manuscript
6views this month
0downloads this month