Clinical Academic Research Internships: what works for nurses and the wider nursing, midwifery and allied health professional workforce

Journal article


Olive, P., Maxton, Fiona, Bell, Cate Ann, Bench, Suzanne, Tinkler, Linda, Jones, Steph and Kenkre, Joyce (2020). Clinical Academic Research Internships: what works for nurses and the wider nursing, midwifery and allied health professional workforce. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15611
AuthorsOlive, P., Maxton, Fiona, Bell, Cate Ann, Bench, Suzanne, Tinkler, Linda, Jones, Steph and Kenkre, Joyce
Abstract

Nurse‐led research and innovation is key to improving health experiences and outcomes and reducing health inequalities. Clinical academic training programmes for nurses to develop research and innovation skills alongside continued development of their clinical practice are becoming increasingly established at national, regional and local levels. Though widely supported, geographical variation in the range and scope of opportunities available remains. It is imperative that clinical academic opportunities for nurses continue to grow to ensure equity of access and opportunity so that the potential of nurse‐led clinical academic research to improve quality of care, health experience and health outcomes can be realised. In this paper we describe and report on clinical academic internship opportunities available to nurses to share internationally, a range of innovative programmes currently in operation across the UK. Examples of some of the tangible benefits for patients, professional development, clinical teams and NHS organisations resulting from these clinical academic internships are illustrated. Information from local evaluations of internship programmes were collated to report what has worked well alongside ‘real‐world’ set‐up and sustainability challenges faced in practice. Clinical academic internship schemes are often opportunistically developed, making use of hybrid models of delivery and funding responsive to local needs and available resources. Key enablers of successful clinical academic internship programmes for nurses were support from senior clinical leaders and established relationships with local universities and wider organisations committed to research capacity building.

KeywordsGeneral Nursing; General Medicine
Year2020
JournalJournal of Clinical Nursing
PublisherWiley
ISSN0962-1067
1365-2702
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15611
Publication dates
Online27 Dec 2020
Publication process dates
Deposited04 Feb 2021
Accepted13 Dec 2020
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Open
Accepted author manuscript
File Access Level
Controlled
Licensehttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8vvz1

Download files


Publisher's version
jocn.15611.pdf
File access level: Open

  • 24
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

How COVID-19 has affected staffing models in intensive care: A qualitative study examining alternative staffing models (SEISMIC).
Endacott, R., Pearce, S., Rae, P., Richardson, A., Bench, S., Pattison, N. and SEISMIC Study Team (2021). How COVID-19 has affected staffing models in intensive care: A qualitative study examining alternative staffing models (SEISMIC). Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15081
Prevalence and experience of fatigue in survivors of critical illness: a mixed‐methods systematic review
Bench, S., Stayt, L., Shah, A., Dhiman, P. and Czuber‐Dochan, W. (2021). Prevalence and experience of fatigue in survivors of critical illness: a mixed‐methods systematic review. Anaesthesia. 76 (9), pp. 1233-1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15441
Exploring adult critical illness survivors’ experiences of fatigue; a qualitative study
Bench, S., Czuber-Dochan, W., Shah, A. and Stayt, L. (2021). Exploring adult critical illness survivors’ experiences of fatigue; a qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14995
Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis
Xyrichis, A., Iliopoulou, K., Mackintosh, N.J., Bench, S., Terblanche, M., Philippou, J. and Sandall, J. (2021). Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017 (11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd012876.pub2
Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing A Qualitative Study
Bench, S. (2020). Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing A Qualitative Study. Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing and Technology. 19 (4), pp. 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000212
Empathy in Action in Healthcare (EACH): A mixed methods study of nurses' and therapists’ empathy
Catlow, R, Aikins-Snyper, F, Carson, M, Jaggi, A and Bench, S (2020). Empathy in Action in Healthcare (EACH): A mixed methods study of nurses' and therapists’ empathy. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100777
Patient and Family Member Experiences in Critical Care Research and Quality Improvement Projects
Bench, S, O'Shea, A and Boaz, Z (2020). Patient and Family Member Experiences in Critical Care Research and Quality Improvement Projects. Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnr.0000000000000443
Neurological Alterations and Management
Bench, S. (2019). Neurological Alterations and Management. in: Aitken, L., Marshall, A. and Chaboyer, W. (ed.) Critical Care Nursing Elsevier.
Evaluating the implementation of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit using a quality improvement approach
Stewart, C. and Bench, S. (2018). Evaluating the implementation of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit using a quality improvement approach. Nursing in Critical Care. 23 (4), pp. 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12354