Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing A Qualitative Study

Journal article


Bench, S. (2020). Critical Care Nurses' Views and Experiences of Preanalytical Factors Influencing Point-of-Care Testing A Qualitative Study. Point of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing and Technology. 19 (4), pp. 97-100. https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000212
AuthorsBench, S.
Abstract

The main users of point of care testing devices placed outside the central laboratory are clinicians, predominantly nurses. Understanding the factors influencing sample
accuracy is important to ensure appropriate clinical decision making. Previous studies focus on the analysis process, however, errors can also occur during the pre-analytical
phase, linked to user knowledge, skills and other factors associated with the wider context of care.

This study explored adult critical care nurses’ views about point of care testing, the challenges they experience and their suggestions on how the pre-analytic phase might
be improved. Using a qualitative design, four focus group discussions took place with 60 critical care nurses studying at two London based Universities between April and
July 2019. Anonymized and verbatim-transcribed focus group data were uploaded into NVivo11 and underwent a standard process of inductive thematic analysis. Findings suggest that nurses’ concerns focus on three key areas: Training and
competence; Sample frequency and volume; and impacts on patients, relatives and staff.

Critical care nurses view POCT as a necessary task, which aids timely patient management. However, the process can detract nurses from performing other care duties. Being able to draw less blood was identified as an important way to increase patient comfort and to reduce risks. Collaborative working is key to ensure that improvements made to the pre-analytical process reflect users’ needs. Ensuring best use of nurses’ time by streamlining preanalytical processes and ensuring equipment is readily available for use is important to ensure other clinical priorities can be achieved.

Keywordspoint of care; nursing; qualitative; focus groups
Year2020
JournalPoint of Care: The Journal of Near-Patient Testing and Technology
Journal citation19 (4), pp. 97-100
PublisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
ISSN1533-029X
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1097/POC.0000000000000212
Publication dates
Print01 Dec 2020
Publication process dates
Accepted12 Aug 2020
Deposited26 Oct 2020
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Additional information

This the accepted version of the manuscript.

Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8qz3y

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
POCT paper submitted.pdf
License: CC BY-NC 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 184
    total views
  • 134
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Fatigue After CriTical illness (FACT): Co-production of a self-management intervention to support people with fatigue after critical illness
Brown, S.E., Shah, A., Czuber-Dochan, W., Bench, S. and Stayt, L. (2024). Fatigue After CriTical illness (FACT): Co-production of a self-management intervention to support people with fatigue after critical illness. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 82, p. 103659. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103659
Experiences of siblings of children with congenital heart disease during Coronavirus disease 2019; A qualitative interview study.
Bichard, E., McKeever, S., Bench, S. and Wray, J. (2022). Experiences of siblings of children with congenital heart disease during Coronavirus disease 2019; A qualitative interview study. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.12.019
How COVID-19 has affected staffing models in intensive care: A qualitative study examining alternative staffing models (SEISMIC).
Endacott, R., Pearce, S., Rae, P., Richardson, A., Bench, S., Pattison, N. and SEISMIC Study Team (2021). How COVID-19 has affected staffing models in intensive care: A qualitative study examining alternative staffing models (SEISMIC). Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15081
Prevalence and experience of fatigue in survivors of critical illness: a mixed‐methods systematic review
Bench, S., Stayt, L., Shah, A., Dhiman, P. and Czuber‐Dochan, W. (2021). Prevalence and experience of fatigue in survivors of critical illness: a mixed‐methods systematic review. Anaesthesia. 76 (9), pp. 1233-1244. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.15441
Clinical Academic Research Internships: what works for nurses and the wider nursing, midwifery and allied health professional workforce
Olive, P., Maxton, Fiona, Bell, Cate Ann, Bench, Suzanne, Tinkler, Linda, Jones, Steph and Kenkre, Joyce (2020). Clinical Academic Research Internships: what works for nurses and the wider nursing, midwifery and allied health professional workforce. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.15611
Exploring adult critical illness survivors’ experiences of fatigue; a qualitative study
Bench, S., Czuber-Dochan, W., Shah, A. and Stayt, L. (2021). Exploring adult critical illness survivors’ experiences of fatigue; a qualitative study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14995
Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis
Xyrichis, A., Iliopoulou, K., Mackintosh, N.J., Bench, S., Terblanche, M., Philippou, J. and Sandall, J. (2021). Healthcare stakeholders’ perceptions and experiences of factors affecting the implementation of critical care telemedicine (CCT): qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2017 (11). https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd012876.pub2
Empathy in Action in Healthcare (EACH): A mixed methods study of nurses' and therapists’ empathy
Catlow, R, Aikins-Snyper, F, Carson, M, Jaggi, A and Bench, S (2020). Empathy in Action in Healthcare (EACH): A mixed methods study of nurses' and therapists’ empathy. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2020.100777
Patient and Family Member Experiences in Critical Care Research and Quality Improvement Projects
Bench, S, O'Shea, A and Boaz, Z (2020). Patient and Family Member Experiences in Critical Care Research and Quality Improvement Projects. Nursing Research. https://doi.org/10.1097/nnr.0000000000000443
Neurological Alterations and Management
Bench, S. (2019). Neurological Alterations and Management. in: Aitken, L., Marshall, A. and Chaboyer, W. (ed.) Critical Care Nursing Elsevier.
Involving patients and families in critical care research and quality improvement
Bench, S (2019). Involving patients and families in critical care research and quality improvement. Nursing in Critical Care. 24 (2), pp. 67-69. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12418
Randomised Controlled Trials: an introduction for nurse researchers
Bench, S, Day, T and Metcalfe, A (2013). Randomised Controlled Trials: an introduction for nurse researchers. Nurse Researcher. 20 (5), pp. 38-44. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2013.05.20.5.38.e312
Evaluating the implementation of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit using a quality improvement approach
Stewart, C. and Bench, S. (2018). Evaluating the implementation of confusion assessment method-intensive care unit using a quality improvement approach. Nursing in Critical Care. 23 (4), pp. 172-178. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12354
Ventilator-associated pneumonia and suction: a review of the literature
Letchford, E and Bench, S (2018). Ventilator-associated pneumonia and suction: a review of the literature. British Journal of Nursing. 27 (1), pp. 13-18. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2018.27.1.13
The education and training needs of advanced clinical practitioners: an exploratory, qualitative study
Bench, S, Lee, G, Baker, E, Trenchard-Turner, N, Whaley, S, Peacock, S, Garry, B, Dover, N, Nwosu, W and Worth, T (2018). The education and training needs of advanced clinical practitioners: an exploratory, qualitative study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice. 8 (8). https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v8n8p66
Reviewing interventions supporting parents' well-being after a child’s intensive care unit discharge
Bench, S and Bedford, Z (2018). Reviewing interventions supporting parents' well-being after a child’s intensive care unit discharge. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12405
The nature and extent of service user involvement in critical care research and quality improvement; a scoping review of the literature.
Bench, S, Eassom, E and Poursanidou, K (2017). The nature and extent of service user involvement in critical care research and quality improvement; a scoping review of the literature. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 42 (2), pp. 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12406
Intensive care discharge summaries for general practice staff: a focus group study
Bench, S, Cornish, J and Xyrichis, A (2016). Intensive care discharge summaries for general practice staff: a focus group study. British Journal of General Practice. 66 (653), pp. e904-e912. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16X688045
Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial
Bench, S, Day, T, Heelas, K, Hopkins, P, White, C and Griffiths, P (2015). Evaluating the feasibility and effectiveness of a critical care discharge information pack for patients and their families: a pilot cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 5 (11), pp. e006852-e006852. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006852
Providing critical care patients with a personalised discharge summary: A questionnaire survey and retrospective analysis exploring feasibility and effectiveness
Bench, S, Heelas, K, White, C and Griffiths, P (2014). Providing critical care patients with a personalised discharge summary: A questionnaire survey and retrospective analysis exploring feasibility and effectiveness. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 30 (2), pp. 69-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2013.08.007
Effectiveness of Critical Care Discharge Information in Supporting Early Recovery From Critical Illness
Bench, S, Day, T and Griffiths, P (2013). Effectiveness of Critical Care Discharge Information in Supporting Early Recovery From Critical Illness. Critical Care Nurse. 33 (3), pp. 41-52. https://doi.org/10.4037/ccn2013134
Developing user centred critical care discharge information to support early critical illness rehabilitation using the Medical Research Council's complex interventions framework
Bench, S, Day, TL and Griffiths, P (2012). Developing user centred critical care discharge information to support early critical illness rehabilitation using the Medical Research Council's complex interventions framework. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing. 28 (2), pp. 123-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2012.02.002
Involving Users in the Development of Effective Critical Care Discharge Information: A Focus Group Study
Bench, S, Day, T and Griffiths, P (2011). Involving Users in the Development of Effective Critical Care Discharge Information: A Focus Group Study. American Journal of Critical Care. 20 (6), pp. 443-452. https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2011829
The user experience of critical care discharge: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research
Bench, S and Day, T (2010). The user experience of critical care discharge: A meta-synthesis of qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 47 (4), pp. 487-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.11.013
Recognition and management of critical illness by midwives: implications for service provision
Bench, S (2007). Recognition and management of critical illness by midwives: implications for service provision. Journal of Nursing Management. 15 (3), pp. 348-356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2007.00759.x
Clinical skills: assessing and treating shock: a nursing perspective
Bench, S (2004). Clinical skills: assessing and treating shock: a nursing perspective. British Journal of Nursing. 13 (12), pp. 715-721. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2004.13.12.13260