Comparisons of students’ perceptions on BIM practice among Australia, China and UK
Jin, R., Zou, P.X., Li, B, Piroozfar, P. and Painting, N. (2019). Comparisons of students’ perceptions on BIM practice among Australia, China and UK. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management. 26 (9), pp. 1899-1923. https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2018-0275
|Authors||Jin, R., Zou, P.X., Li, B, Piroozfar, P. and Painting, N.|
University students are the future driving forces in and leaders of the architectural, engineering and construction (AEC) industry advancement. Although BIM pedagogical studies have been performed in different institutions, there has not been sufficient research providing a global perspective of BIM education and students’ perceptions toward BIM practice and application following their learning progress. The purpose of this paper is to adopt student samples from Swinburne University of Technology (SUT, Australia), Wenzhou University (WZU, China) and University of Brighton (UK) as three case studies to investigate the BIM practice and application-related perceptions and motivations.
Based on the thorough understanding of the BIM pedagogical delivery including teaching contents and assessment methods among the three institutions, a questionnaire survey approach was adopted to collect AEC students’ perceptions of BIM. Within each selected case, statistical analysis was conducted to investigate both the overall sample and subgroup differences regarding students’ opinions on BIM’s functions (e.g. as a 3D visualization tool) and BIM usefulness in various industry professions, their motivation in BIM-related jobs and their perceptions of challenges encountered in BIM practice and application. Multiple factors influencing BIM learners’ perceptions were discussed, such as pedagogical assessment approach, and individual factors (e.g. disciplines).
The results showed that students were able to discern the latest industry practices and critical thinking in BIM movements. For example, SUT students perceived more challenges from the government legislation or incentive policies, which was consistent with Australia’s BIM policy movement. WZU students tended to have less positive views on BIM usefulness. The results also indicated fewer differences regarding perceived challenges among students from these three institutions.
This study contributed to the body of knowledge in managerial BIM by focusing on learners’ perceptions from the perspective of students’ understanding, motivation and individual views of BIM, which were insightful to both BIM educators and employers. By initiating the framework of BIM learning process and its influence factors, the current study serves as a point of reference to continue the future work in strengthening the connection between institutional BIM education and industry practical needs worldwide.
|Journal||Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management|
|Journal citation||26 (9), pp. 1899-1923|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1108/ecam-07-2018-0275|
|21 Oct 2019|
|Publication process dates|
|Deposited||29 May 2020|
|Accepted author manuscript|
File Access Level
0views this month
0downloads this month