Designing assisted living technologies 'in the wild': Preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology

Journal article


Wherton, J, Sugarhood, P, Procter, R, Rouncefield, M, Dewsbury, G, Hinder, S and Greenhalgh, T (2012). Designing assisted living technologies 'in the wild': Preliminary experiences with cultural probe methodology. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 12 (1), pp. 188-. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-188
AuthorsWherton, J, Sugarhood, P, Procter, R, Rouncefield, M, Dewsbury, G, Hinder, S and Greenhalgh, T
Abstract

Background: There is growing interest in assisted living technologies to support independence at home. Such technologies should ideally be designed 'in the wild' i.e. taking account of how real people live in real homes and communities. The ATHENE (Assistive Technologies for Healthy Living in Elders: Needs Assessment by Ethnography) project seeks to illuminate the living needs of older people and facilitate the co-production with older people of technologies and services. This paper describes the development of a cultural probe tool produced as part of the ATHENE project and how it was used to support home visit interviews with elders with a range of ethnic and social backgrounds, family circumstances, health conditions and assisted living needs. Method. Thirty one people aged 60 to 98 were visited in their homes on three occasions. Following an initial interview, participants were given a set of cultural probe materials, including a digital camera and the 'Home and Life Scrapbook' to complete in their own time for one week. Activities within the Home and Life Scrapbook included maps (indicating their relationships to people, places and objects), lists (e.g. likes, dislikes, things they were concerned about, things they were comfortable with), wishes (things they wanted to change or improve), body outline (indicating symptoms or impairments), home plan (room layouts of their homes to indicate spaces and objects used) and a diary. After one week, the researcher and participant reviewed any digital photos taken and the content of the Home and Life Scrapbook as part of the home visit interview. Findings. The cultural probe facilitated collection of visual, narrative and material data by older people, and appeared to generate high levels of engagement from some participants. However, others used the probe minimally or not at all for various reasons including limited literacy, physical problems (e.g. holding a pen), lack of time or energy, limited emotional or psychological resources, life events, and acute illness. Discussions between researchers and participants about the materials collected (and sometimes about what had prevented them completing the tasks) helped elicit further information relevant to assisted living technology design. The probe materials were particularly helpful when having conversations with non-English speaking participants through an interpreter. Conclusions: Cultural probe methods can help build a rich picture of the lives and experiences of older people to facilitate the co-production of assisted living technologies. But their application may be constrained by the participant's physical, mental and emotional capacity. They are most effective when used as a tool to facilitate communication and development of a deeper understanding of older people's needs. © 2012 Wherton et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

KeywordsHumans; Self-Help Devices; Aging; Social Environment; Social Support; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Middle Aged; Assisted Living Facilities; House Calls; Female; Male; Independent Living
Year2012
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Journal citation12 (1), pp. 188-
PublisherSpringer
ISSN1471-2288
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-188
Publication dates
Print24 Dec 2012
Online20 Dec 2012
Publication process dates
Accepted16 Dec 2012
Deposited27 Nov 2020
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8v717

Download files

  • 95
    total views
  • 71
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Experiences of Using Pathways and Resources for Participation and Engagement (PREP) Intervention for Children with Acquired Brain Injury: A Knowledge Translation Study.
Burrough, Melanie, Beanlands, C. and Sugarhood, P. (2020). Experiences of Using Pathways and Resources for Participation and Engagement (PREP) Intervention for Children with Acquired Brain Injury: A Knowledge Translation Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 17 (23). https://doi.org/ijerph17238736
Green walking groups: a mixed methods review of the mental health outcomes for adults with mental health problems
Swinson, T., Wenborn, J. and Sugarhood, P. (2019). Green walking groups: a mixed methods review of the mental health outcomes for adults with mental health problems. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022619888880
The Handy Approach - Quick Integrated Person Centred Support Preparation.
Risi, L, Brown, J, Sugarhood, PA, Depala, B, Olowosoyo, A, Tomu, C, Gonzalez, L, Munoz-Cobo, M, Adekunle, O, Ogwal, O, Evans, E and Shah, A (2017). The Handy Approach - Quick Integrated Person Centred Support Preparation. BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjquality.u214461.w5681
Telecare call centre work and ageing in place
Procter, R, Wherton, J, Greenhalgh, T, Sugarhood, PA, Rouncefield, M and Hinder, S (2016). Telecare call centre work and ageing in place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work: CSCW. 25 (1), pp. 79-105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9242-5
Participation in advanced age: enacting values, an adaptive process
Sugarhood, PA, Eakin, P and Summerfield-Mann, L (2016). Participation in advanced age: enacting values, an adaptive process. Ageing and Society. 37 (8), pp. 1654-1680. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X16000568
What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services
Greenhalgh, T, Procter, R, Wherton, J, Sugarhood, P, Hinder, S and Rouncefield, M (2015). What is quality in assisted living technology? The ARCHIE framework for effective telehealth and telecare services. BMC Medicine. 13 (1), pp. 91-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-015-0279-6
Co-production in practice: How people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services
Wherton, J, Sugarhood, P, Procter, R, Hinder, S and Greenhalgh, T (2015). Co-production in practice: How people with assisted living needs can help design and evolve technologies and services. Implementation Science. 10 (75), pp. 75-. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-015-0271-8
The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place.
Procter, R, Greenhalgh, T, Wherton, J, Sugarhood, P, Rouncefield, M and Hinder, S (2014). The Day-to-Day Co-Production of Ageing in Place. Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 23 (3), pp. 245-267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-014-9202-5
Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare
Sugarhood, P., Wherton, J., Procter, R., Hinder, S. and Greenhalgh, T. Technology as system innovation: a key informant interview study of the application of the diffusion of innovation model to telecare. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. 9 (1), pp. 79-87. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.3109/17483107.2013.823573
What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Sugarhood, P., Hinder, S., Procter, R. and Stones, R. (2013). What matters to older people with assisted living needs? A phenomenological analysis of the use and non-use of telehealth and telecare. Social Science and Medicine. 93, pp. 86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.05.036
The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: Discourse analysis
Greenhalgh, T, Procter, R, Wherton, J, Sugarhood, P and Shaw, S (2012). The organising vision for telehealth and telecare: Discourse analysis. BMJ Open. 2 (4), pp. e001574-e001574. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001574