Post-Digital Research - Editorial
Andersen, C.U. and Cox, G. (2014). Post-Digital Research - Editorial. APRJA. 3 (1).
|Authors||Andersen, C.U. and Cox, G.|
Although in many ways the post-digital “sucks but is useful” as Florian Cramer notes in his contribution, this issue of A Peer-Reviewed Journal About Post-Digital Research takes it to be a serious concept that deserves our critical attention. The journal issue is divided into three sections, that address the term itself, its genealogy and wider connotations, as well as its potential usefulness across different fields (including art, acoustics, aesthetic theory, political economy and philosophy). Given that the term comes from practice, it also addresses how the post-digital potentially operates as a framework for practice-based research that relate to material and historical conditions.
|Journal citation||3 (1)|
|Publisher||Digital Aesthetics Research Centre / Center for Digital Æstetikforskning|
|Web address (URL)||https://aprja.net//issue/view/8400|
|01 Jun 2014|
|Online||01 Jun 2014|
|Publication process dates|
|Accepted||01 Jun 2014|
|Deposited||27 Jan 2020|
File Access Level
|Accepted author manuscript|
5views this month
17downloads this month