Lessons for the UK Green Deal from the US BBNP

Journal article


Gillich, A (2016). Lessons for the UK Green Deal from the US BBNP. Building Research & Information. 45 (4), pp. 384-395.
AuthorsGillich, A
Abstract

How can programme design and strategy drive the decision actually to undertake retrofit upgrades? The US Better Buildings Neighborhood Program (BBNP) and the UK Green Deal both represent ambitious efforts to drive domestic retrofit markets. These programmes are compared and the differences in their conversion rates explored in the context of marketing, outreach and workforce engagement strategies. The impact of financial incentives is also explored. This paper supports the consensus that the US BBNP was successful against most of its stated objectives. The UK Green Deal, while slow to start, was gaining momentum before it was effectively ended. Semi-structured interviews with programme organizers give evidence that the Green Deal would have benefited from a more active approach to marketing and outreach, specifically emphasizing the distinction between the two. Marketing generates interest, but local outreach through word of mouth and personal referrals is needed to drive upgrades. The Green Deal did not sufficiently engage the workforce through an ongoing communication strategy and should have better facilitated both technical and non-technical skills development. The interest rate of the Green Deal is shown to be but one factor influencing participation, and can be effectively balanced through programme design in other areas.

KeywordsArchitecture; Building; Building & Construction
Year2016
JournalBuilding Research & Information
Journal citation45 (4), pp. 384-395
PublisherTaylor & Francis (Routledge): STM, Behavioural Science and Public Health Titles
ISSN0961-3218
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1080/09613218.2016.1159500
Publication dates
Print13 Apr 2016
Publication process dates
Deposited17 Aug 2017
Accepted13 Mar 2016
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY 4.0
File description
Supplementary Information
Supplemental file
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8747x

  • 5
    total views
  • 34
    total downloads
  • 3
    views this month
  • 3
    downloads this month

Related outputs

Modelling development and analysis on the Balanced Energy Networks (BEN) in London
Song, WH, Wang, Y, Gillich, A, Ford, A and Hewitt, M (2018). Modelling development and analysis on the Balanced Energy Networks (BEN) in London. Applied Energy. 233/4, pp. 114-125.
Limits and uncertainty for energy efficiency in the UK housing stock
Gillich, A., Mahmoudi Saber, E. and Mohareb, E. (2019). Limits and uncertainty for energy efficiency in the UK housing stock. Energy Policy. 133.
Overcoming Practical Challenges and Implementing Low-Carbon Heat in the UK: Lessons from the Balanced Energy Network (BEN) at LSBU
Arif, M, Gillich, A, Ford, A and Wang, Y (2018). Overcoming Practical Challenges and Implementing Low-Carbon Heat in the UK: Lessons from the Balanced Energy Network (BEN) at LSBU. CIBSE Technical Symposium. London 12 - 13 Apr 2018
A smarter way to electrify heat – The Balanced Energy Network approach to demand side response in the UK
Gillich, A (2017). A smarter way to electrify heat – The Balanced Energy Network approach to demand side response in the UK. European Council for an Energy Efficient Economy (ECEEE) Summer Study. Hyeres, France 29 May - 03 Jun 2017 London South Bank University.
Why Education and User Feedback Won’t Close the Performance Gap for University Accommodation
Gillich, A, Sunikka-Blank, M and Ford, A (2015). Why Education and User Feedback Won’t Close the Performance Gap for University Accommodation. CIBSE Technical Symposium. London 16 - 17 Apr 2015 London South Bank University.
Designing an ‘optimal’ domestic retrofit programme
Gillich, A, Sunikka-Blank, M and Ford, A (2017). Designing an ‘optimal’ domestic retrofit programme. Building Research & Information.