Do you want therapy with that? A critical account of working within IAPT

Journal article


Binnie, J (2015). Do you want therapy with that? A critical account of working within IAPT. Mental Health Review Journal. 20 (2), pp. 79 - 83.
AuthorsBinnie, J
Abstract

© Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Purpose: The IAPT programme has been rolled out across England in the last ten years. Although undoubtedly many people have benefited from having greater access to psychological therapy there are several issues with the practicalities of Improving Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) and also with its ideology. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach: This is a personal reflection of working within the IAPT system for several years. Significant statements heard or interpretations of what has been said are presented alongside an analysis of the implications. Findings: A number of important concerns are presented. The overarching concept of the "McDonaldization" process is discussed as a way of encapsulating the IAPT experience; with its theoretical reliance on the medical model and the real world impact of tendering for services in the modern NHS. The impact of IAPT on cognitive behavioural psychotherapy is also highlighted. Originality/value: A lot has been written in the press and online about IAPT Many of the criticisms seem to derive from people outside of the IAPT system, many of whom have their own personal or professional agenda for attacking IAPT and Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT); often the criticisms are uninformed. This paper is a reflection of working within the IAPT system and not just an uninformed critique of CBT. Several concerns are raised that without remedy may seriously hold back the progress that psychological therapy has made in recent years.

Year2015
JournalMental Health Review Journal
Journal citation20 (2), pp. 79 - 83
PublisherLondon South Bank University
ISSN1361-9322
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1108/MHRJ-11-2014-0044
Publication dates
Print08 Jun 2015
Publication process dates
Deposited25 Jan 2017
Accepted08 Jun 2015
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY 4.0
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8769q

  • 6
    total views
  • 18
    total downloads
  • 6
    views this month
  • 18
    downloads this month

Related outputs

Development and implications of pornography use: a narrative review
Binnie, J and Reavey, P (2019). Development and implications of pornography use: a narrative review. Sexual and Relationship Therapy.
Doctors as patients: how psychological therapists experience the opposing ideologies
Silk, C and Binnie, J (2018). Doctors as patients: how psychological therapists experience the opposing ideologies. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling.
Let’s put the ‘T’ back into CBT
Binnie, J and Spada, MM (2018). Let’s put the ‘T’ back into CBT. Mental Health Review Journal. 23 (4), pp. 240-245.
Teaching CBT to Pre-Registration nurses: A critical account of a teaching session to pre-registration mental health nurses on the subject of cognitive behavioural therapy and trauma.
Binnie, J (2018). Teaching CBT to Pre-Registration nurses: A critical account of a teaching session to pre-registration mental health nurses on the subject of cognitive behavioural therapy and trauma. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. 22 (1), pp. 55-64.
Medical approaches to suffering are limited, so why critique Improving Access to Psychological Therapies from the same ideology.
Binnie, J (2018). Medical approaches to suffering are limited, so why critique Improving Access to Psychological Therapies from the same ideology. Journal of health psychology. 23 (9), pp. 1159-1162.
Cognitive behavioural treatment for problematic hoarding: A case study
Binnie, J (2015). Cognitive behavioural treatment for problematic hoarding: A case study. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. 20 (1), pp. 5 - 14.
Non-attendance at psychological therapy appointments
Binnie, J and Boden, Z (2016). Non-attendance at psychological therapy appointments. Mental Health Review Journal. 21 (3), pp. 231-248.