Barriers to BIM implementation and ways forward to improve its adoption in the Nigerian AEC firms

Journal article


Babatunde, SO, Udeaja, C and Adekunle, AO (2020). Barriers to BIM implementation and ways forward to improve its adoption in the Nigerian AEC firms. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbpa-05-2019-0047
AuthorsBabatunde, SO, Udeaja, C and Adekunle, AO
Abstract

Purpose –BIM has much potential to improve the effectiveness of construction works with respect to design, construction and maintenance. However, many Architecture, Engineering, and
Construction (AEC) firms are still lagging in the adoption and implementation of BIM in both developing and developed countries. The purpose of this study is to assess the barriers to BIM implementation, and examine the ways forward to improve BIM adoption within the Nigerian AEC firms.

Design/methodology/approach – A comprehensive literature review and questionnaire survey were used in the study. The survey targeted four different AEC firms. These include architectural firms, facility management firms, quantity surveying firms and structural engineering firms in
Lagos, Nigeria. The data obtained were analyzed using mean score, standard deviation, KruskalWallis test, and factor analysis.

Findings – The study identified 20 barriers to BIM implementation and identified 10 ways forward to improve BIM adoption in AEC firms, particularly in Nigeria. The relative importance of both the identified barriers and the ways forward were gauged. The Kruskal-Wallis tests
revealed that except for one (out of 20) identified barriers, and one (out of 10) identified ways forward; there is no statistical significant difference in the perceptions of four different AEC firms. The factor analysis result grouped the 20 identified barriers into three major factors to
include: weak top management support and BIM environment related issues; cost of BIM software and training issues; and incompatibility, legal, contractual, and culture related issues.

Practical implications – The significance of the study cannot be over-emphasized due to BIM relevance to construction stakeholders and researchers at large.

Originality/value – The study findings would inform the decisions of the construction stakeholders to make some policy recommendations capable of positively influencing the full BIM implementation in AEC firms.

KeywordsAEC firms; BIM; Barriers; Construction stakeholders; construction industry; Developing countries
Year2020
JournalInternational Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation
PublisherEmerald
ISSN2398-4708
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1108/ijbpa-05-2019-0047
Publication dates
Print23 Mar 2020
Publication process dates
Accepted23 Mar 2020
Deposited17 Sep 2020
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8q9w1

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
  • 27
    total views
  • 97
    total downloads
  • 4
    views this month
  • 12
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Stakeholder perceptions of drivers for, and barriers to, the incorporation of sustainability in PPP infrastructure projects in Nigeria
Babatunde, S.O., Ekundayo, D., Udeaja, C. and Abubakar, U.O. (2020). Stakeholder perceptions of drivers for, and barriers to, the incorporation of sustainability in PPP infrastructure projects in Nigeria. Open House International. 45 (4), pp. 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/OHI-05-2020-0037
Enhancing heritage and traditional architecture conservation through digital technologies. developing a digital conservation handbook for as-salt, jordan
Trillo, C., Aburamadan, R., Udeaja, C., Moustaka, A., Baffour, K.G. and Makore, B.C.N. (2020). Enhancing heritage and traditional architecture conservation through digital technologies. developing a digital conservation handbook for as-salt, jordan. in: New Metropolitan Perspectives Knowledge Dynamics, Innovation-driven Policies Towards the Territories’ Attractiveness Volume 1 Springer International Publishing. pp. 211-219
An investigation into the sustainability practices in PPP infrastructure projects: a case of Nigeria
Babatunde, SO, Ekundayo, D, Udeaja, C and Abubakar, UO (2020). An investigation into the sustainability practices in PPP infrastructure projects: a case of Nigeria. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-04-2020-0048
Urban Heritage Conservation and Rapid Urbanization: Insights from Surat, India
Udeaja, C., Trillo, C., Awuah, K., Makore, B., Patel, D., Mansuri, L. and Jha, K. (2020). Urban Heritage Conservation and Rapid Urbanization: Insights from Surat, India. Sustainability. 12 (6), pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062172
Evaluation of the drivers of bim implementation to support the delivery of client requirements (crs) among the early bim adopters
Shahrin, F. and Udeaja, C. (2019). Evaluation of the drivers of bim implementation to support the delivery of client requirements (crs) among the early bim adopters. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2019. Leeds 02 - 04 Sep 2019 pp. 235-244
To formulate a conceptual model for innovation: Reframing theoretical constructs of bim adoption within sme organisations
Makarfi, U. and Udeaja, C. (2019). To formulate a conceptual model for innovation: Reframing theoretical constructs of bim adoption within sme organisations. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2019. Leeds 02 - 04 Sep 2019 pp. 265-272
Scientometric analysis and mapping of digital technologies used in cultural heritage field
Mansuri, L., Udeaja, C., Trillo, C., Kwasi, G., Patel, D., Jha, K., Makore, CB and Gupta, S (2019). Scientometric analysis and mapping of digital technologies used in cultural heritage field. Association of Researchers in Construction Management, ARCOM 2019. Leeds 02 - 04 Sep 2019 pp. 255-264
Life cycle carbon emissions and comparative evaluation of selected open source UK embodied carbon counting tools
Ekundayo, D., Babatunde, S.O., Ekundayo, A., Perera, S. and Udeaja, C. (2019). Life cycle carbon emissions and comparative evaluation of selected open source UK embodied carbon counting tools. Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Buildings. 19 (2), pp. 220-242. https://doi.org//10.5130/AJCEB.v19i2.6692
Obstacles and Benefits in implementation of Gold, Silver, and Bronze (GSB) Model in Emergency Response in the UAE
Alawadhi, S. and Udeaja, C. (2018). Obstacles and Benefits in implementation of Gold, Silver, and Bronze (GSB) Model in Emergency Response in the UAE. Procedia Engineering. 212, pp. 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2018.01.055
Implementing GIS to improve hospital efficiency in natural disasters
Nia, S.P.S., Kulatunga, U., Udeaja, C. and Valadi, S. (2018). Implementing GIS to improve hospital efficiency in natural disasters. GeoInformation For Disaster Management (Gi4DM). Istanbul 18 - 21 Mar 2018 Copernicus GmbH. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-3-W4-369-2018
The critical success factors for stakeholder management in the restoration of built heritage assets in the UK
Nwachukwu, C.V., Udeaja, C., Chileshe, N. and Okere, C.E. (2017). The critical success factors for stakeholder management in the restoration of built heritage assets in the UK. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation. 35 (4), pp. 304-331. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJBPA-07-2017-0030
Sustainable development in a construction related curriculum- quantity surveying students’ perspective
Tan A., Udeaja, C., Babatunde, S.O. and Ekundayo, D. (2017). Sustainable development in a construction related curriculum- quantity surveying students’ perspective. International Journal of Strategic Property Management. 21 (1), pp. 101-113. https://doi.org/10.3846/1648715X.2016.1246387
BIM adoption within Australian Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): an innovation diffusion model
Hosseini, M.R., Banihashemi, S., Chileshe, N., Namzadi, M.O., Udeaja, C., Rameezdeen, R. and McCuen, T. (2016). BIM adoption within Australian Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs): an innovation diffusion model. Australian Journal of Construction Economics and Buildings. 16 (3), pp. 71-86. https://doi.org/10.5130/AJCEB.v16i3.5159