‘It’s not a Muslim ban!’ Indirect speech acts and the securitisation of Islam in the United States post-9/11

Journal article


Eroukhmanoff, C (2018). ‘It’s not a Muslim ban!’ Indirect speech acts and the securitisation of Islam in the United States post-9/11. Global Discourse / Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought. 8 (1), pp. 5-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1439873
AuthorsEroukhmanoff, C
Abstract

According to the Copenhagen School, a political issue is prioritized, or ‘securitised’, when an audience accepts a speech act with a particular security grammar pointing to the dangerous nature of the threat and calling for extraordinary security measures. This article probes the opposite: what if not saying ‘security’ and instead saying ‘friend’ also contributes to the securitisation? I explore this logic with the ways in which Islam has been securitised in the United States from the Bush administration to the beginning of the Trump administration and offer an analysis of what this article calls the ‘indirect securitisation of Islam.’ Drawing on the philosophy of language of John Searle, an indirect securitisation is one that is successful through indirect securitising speech acts, that is, utterances that comprise two illocutions, one direct and one indirect, with the latter being the ‘real’ request of the utterance. Using covert forms of speech such as indirect speech acts enables elite speakers to ‘deny plausibility’ and claim they are not securitising (or ‘the least racist person’ as Trump claims), thereby ‘saving face.’ Indirect securitising speech acts are therefore an important strategic tool in elite actors’ securitising playbook. The article seeks to make sense of a climate of American politics that seem ungoverned by conventional rules of speech by offering a timely study of how political leaders can ‘have their cake and eat it too’ in matters of national security.

KeywordsMuslim ban; Donald trump; Indirect securitisation; securitisation theory; indirect speech act; Islam
Year2018
JournalGlobal Discourse / Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought
Journal citation8 (1), pp. 5-25
PublisherRoutledge (Taylor & Francis Group)
ISSN2043-7897
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/23269995.2018.1439873
Publication dates
Print23 Feb 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited17 Feb 2018
Accepted09 Feb 2018
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Additional information

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article to be published by Taylor & Francis in Global Discourse / Global Discourse: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Current Affairs and Applied Contemporary Thought. It will be available online: http://www.tandfonline.com.

Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/86vy8

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
Author Accepted Manuscript It%27s not a Muslim ban.docx
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 445
    total views
  • 300
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Feminist policymaking in turbulent times: critical perspectives
Eroukhmanoff, C., Caballero Sosa, L/, Céspedes, L., Jaramillo Ruiz, L., Nielsen, R., Robinson, F., Singh Rathore, K., Wright, K.A.M., Kebaïli, S., Bergman Rosamond, A., Tamang, D., Thomson, J., Partis-Jennings, H.,, Minorities of Peace and Security, Saalbrink, R., Othim, C., Kula, T. and Haastrup, T. Eroukhmanoff, C. (ed.) (2024). Feminist policymaking in turbulent times: critical perspectives. Routledge Routledge.
Emotions
Eroukhmanoff, C., Head, N. and Beattie, A. (2024). Emotions. in: Shepherd, L., Crilley, R., Wilkinson, C., Fishel, S. and Manchanda, N. (ed.) Thinking World Politics Otherwise Oxford University Press (OUP).
A gendered analysis of US decline: a cautionary tale
Eroukhmanoff, C. (2024). A gendered analysis of US decline: a cautionary tale. International Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/00471178241229372
Troubling French Feminist Diplomacy with the National Context
Eroukhmanoff, C. (2024). Troubling French Feminist Diplomacy with the National Context. in: Eroukhmanoff, C. and Partis-Jennings, H. (ed.) Feminist Policymaking in Turbulent Times: Critical Perspectives Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group). pp. 1-24
Keir Starmer’s chance to sparkle: Labour leader finally puts his working class credentials to work for him
Eroukhmanoff, C. and Prior, A. (2023). Keir Starmer’s chance to sparkle: Labour leader finally puts his working class credentials to work for him. The Conversation The Conversation.
Political leaders need a grand narrative – Rishi Sunak’s is a story of decline
Eroukhmanoff, C. and Prior, A. (2023). Political leaders need a grand narrative – Rishi Sunak’s is a story of decline. The Conversation.
Introduction: Constructing and Contesting Victimhood in Global Politics
Eroukhmanoff, C. and Wedderburn, A. (2022). Introduction: Constructing and Contesting Victimhood in Global Politics. Polity. https://doi.org/10.1086/721562
Introduction: Interrogating the ‘everyday’ politics of emotions in international relations
Beattie, AR, Eroukhmanoff, C and Head, N (2019). Introduction: Interrogating the ‘everyday’ politics of emotions in international relations. Journal of International Political Theory. 15 (2), pp. 136-147. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088219830428
Responding to terrorism with peace, love and solidarity: ‘Je suis Charlie’, ‘Peace’ and ‘I Heart MCR’
Eroukhmanoff, C (2019). Responding to terrorism with peace, love and solidarity: ‘Je suis Charlie’, ‘Peace’ and ‘I Heart MCR’. Journal of International Political Theory. 15 (2), pp. 167-187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088219829884
The securitisation of Islam: covert racism and affect in the US post-9/11
Eroukhmanoff, C (2019). The securitisation of Islam: covert racism and affect in the US post-9/11. Manchester Manchester University Press.
Scholars’ agency in securitisation: a leap forward
Eroukhmanoff, C (2015). Scholars’ agency in securitisation: a leap forward. The Duck of Minerva [blog].
Securing diplomacy in the war on terrorism: a critical perspective
Eroukhmanoff, C (2018). Securing diplomacy in the war on terrorism: a critical perspective. in: Cusumano, E and Kinsey, C (ed.) Diplomatic Security Stanford Stanford University Press.
Securitisation Theory
Eroukhmanoff, C (2017). Securitisation Theory. in: Stephen McGlinchey, SM, Rosie Walters, RW and Christian Scheinpflug, CS (ed.) International Relations Theory Bristol E-International Relations.
Emotions and Time: Approaching Emotions through a Fusion of Horizons
Eroukhmanoff, C and Teles Fazendeiro, BTF (2017). Emotions and Time: Approaching Emotions through a Fusion of Horizons. in: Sangar, ES and Clement, MC (ed.) Researching emotions in International Relations: Methodological perspectives for a new paradigm Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 255-276
A Feminist Reading of Foreign Policy under Trump: Mother of All Bombs, Wall, and the “Locker Room Banter”
Eroukhmanoff, C (2017). A Feminist Reading of Foreign Policy under Trump: Mother of All Bombs, Wall, and the “Locker Room Banter”. Critical Studies on Security. 5 (3). https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2017.1355156
100 Days of Trump: Security and Foreign Policy Implications
Bentley, M, Eroukhmanoff, C and Hackett, U (2017). 100 Days of Trump: Security and Foreign Policy Implications. Critical Studies on Security. 5 (3), pp. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.1080/21624887.2017.1355153
A Critical Contribution to the “Security-Religion” Nexus: Going Beyond the Analytical
Eroukhmanoff, C (2016). A Critical Contribution to the “Security-Religion” Nexus: Going Beyond the Analytical. International Studies Review. 18 (2), pp. 366-378. https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/viw008
The remote securitisation of Islam in the US post-9/11: euphemisation, metaphors and the “logic of expected consequences” in counter-radicalisation discourse
Eroukhmanoff, C (2015). The remote securitisation of Islam in the US post-9/11: euphemisation, metaphors and the “logic of expected consequences” in counter-radicalisation discourse. Critical Studies on Terrorism. 8 (2), pp. 246-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2015.1053747