A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an exemplar

Journal article


Crichton, N, Rycroft-Malone, J, Seers, K, Eldh, AC, Karen, C, Harvey, G, Hawkes, C, Kitson, A, McCormack, B, McMullan, C, Mockford, C, Niessen, T, Slater, P, Titchen, A, van der Zijpp, T and Wallin, L (2018). A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an exemplar. Implementation Science. 13, p. 138.
AuthorsCrichton, N, Rycroft-Malone, J, Seers, K, Eldh, AC, Karen, C, Harvey, G, Hawkes, C, Kitson, A, McCormack, B, McMullan, C, Mockford, C, Niessen, T, Slater, P, Titchen, A, van der Zijpp, T and Wallin, L
Abstract

Background Facilitation is a promising implementation intervention, which requires theory informed evaluation. This paper presents an exemplar of a multi-country realist process evaluation that was embedded in the first international randomised controlled trial evaluating two types of facilitation for implementing urinary continence care recommendations. We aimed to uncover what worked (and did not work), for whom, how, why and in what circumstances during the process of implementing the facilitation interventions in practice. Methods This realist process evaluation included theory formulation, theory testing and refining. Data were collected in 24 care home sites across four European countries. Data were collected over four time-points using multiple qualitative methods: observation (372 hours), interviews with staff (n=357), residents (n=152), next of kin (n=109) other stakeholders (n=128), supplemented by facilitator activity logs. A combined inductive and deductive data analysis process focused on realist theory refinement and testing. Results The content and approach of the two facilitation programmes prompted variable opportunities to align and realign support with the needs and expectations of facilitators and homes. This influenced their level of confidence in fulfilling the facilitator role, and ability to deliver the intervention as planned. The success of intervention implementation was largely dependent on whether sites prioritised their involvement in both the study and the facilitation programme. In contexts where the study was prioritised (including release of resources) and where managers and staff support was sustained, this prompted collective engagement (as an attitude and action). Internal facilitators' (IF) personal characteristics and abilities, including personal and formal authority, in combination with a supportive environment prompted by managers triggered the potential for learning over time. Learning over time resulted in a sense of confidence and personal growth, and enactment of the facilitation role, which resulted in practice changes. Conclusion The scale and multi-country nature of this study provided a novel context to conduct one of the few trial embedded realist informed process evaluations. In addition to providing an explanatory account of implementation processes, a conceptual platform for future facilitation research is presented. Finally a realist informed process evaluation framework is outlined, which could inform future research of this nature.

Keywords11 Medical And Health Sciences; 08 Information And Computing Sciences; Health Policy & Services
Year2018
JournalImplementation Science
Journal citation13, p. 138
PublisherBioMed Central
ISSN1748-5908
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)doi:10.1186/s13012-018-0811-0
Publication dates
Print16 Nov 2018
Publication process dates
Deposited17 Oct 2018
Accepted26 Aug 2018
Accepted author manuscript
License
CC BY 4.0
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/868qv

  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Related outputs

Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE): an international cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate two models of facilitation informed by the Promoting Action in Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework.
Crichton, N, Seers, K, Rycroft-Malone, J, Edwards, RT, Eldh, AC, Estabrooks, C, Harvey, G, Hawkes, C, Jones, C, Kitson, A, McCormack, B, McCullan, C, Mockford, C, Niessen, T, Slater, P, Titchen, A, van der Zijpp, T and Wallin, L (2018). Facilitating Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE): an international cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate two models of facilitation informed by the Promoting Action in Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implementation Science. 13 (1).
A prospective observational study of machine translation software to overcome the challenge of including ethnic diversity in healthcare research
Taylor, RM, Crichton, N, Moult, B and Gibson, F (2015). A prospective observational study of machine translation software to overcome the challenge of including ethnic diversity in healthcare research. Nursing Open. 2 (1), pp. 14-23.
Using community development to build critical health literacy
Sykes, SM, Wills, JD and Crichton, N (2016). Using community development to build critical health literacy. 4th Health Literacy Conference - Health Literacy. Glasgow 18 Mar 2016 London South Bank University.
Warm Needle Acupuncture vs. Needle Acupuncture for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Pilot Study Protocol
Appleyard, I, Crichton, N and Robinson, N (2016). Warm Needle Acupuncture vs. Needle Acupuncture for Osteoarthritis of the Knee: A Pilot Study Protocol. European Journal of Integrative Medicine. 8 (4), pp. 407-413.