Playing cards against the state: precarious lives, conspiracy theories, and the production of ‘irrational’ subjects

Journal article


Johnson-Schlee, S (2019). Playing cards against the state: precarious lives, conspiracy theories, and the production of ‘irrational’ subjects. Geoforum. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.013
AuthorsJohnson-Schlee, S
Abstract

Abstract
This paper discusses the role of conspiracy theory in political speech amongst service users at a soup kitchen in Brixton, south London. Rather than categorizing conspiracy theories as ‘irrational’ it argues that this speech must be read in the context of precarity and an oppositional relationship with the state. In particular the paper argues that ‘behavior change theory’, which has become a key influence in British social policy, works on the basis that those at the margins of society are not fully capable of making the right decisions for themselves. Behaviour change theory, which has become influential around the world, excludes the most marginal aspects of society from political discourse by assuming they are ‘irrational’. In this way the very ontological security (Giddens 1991, Laing 2010, Philo 2014) of individuals on the margins of society is threatened by policies which aims to govern behavior and territorialize precarious lives. This paper will argue that conspiracy theories, where deployed by marginalized people, are strategies which attempt to act across multiple political scales. From the socially marginal space of the soup kitchen, conspiracy theories claim knowledge of larger scale political geographies. This paper demonstrates that an ethnographic method is instrumental in exploring this multi-scalar complexity.
Keywords: Conspiracy Theory, Precarity, Behaviour Change, Ethnography, Poverty, Welfare, Austerity

Year2019
JournalGeoforum
PublisherElsevier
ISSN0016-7185
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.013
Publication dates
Print21 Feb 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited16 Feb 2019
Accepted09 Feb 2019
Accepted author manuscript
License
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/8678y

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
  • 169
    total views
  • 83
    total downloads
  • 4
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Introduction to the Special Issue on Material Cultures of Reconstruction in post-war London
Johnson-Schlee, S. (2021). Introduction to the Special Issue on Material Cultures of Reconstruction in post-war London. The London Journal. 46 (1), pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2020.1869430
Living Rooms
Johnson-Schlee, S. (2022). Living Rooms. London Peninsula Press.
The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism: Normalising Precarity in Austerity London
Johnson-Schlee, S. (2022). The Permanence of Temporary Urbanism: Normalising Precarity in Austerity London. The London Journal. 48 (2), pp. 196-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2022.2119529
Building Site Ontologies: Post-war London in the Paintings of Auerbach and Kossoff
Johnson-Schlee, S. (2020). Building Site Ontologies: Post-war London in the Paintings of Auerbach and Kossoff. The London Journal. 46 (1), pp. 92-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/03058034.2020.1832364
What would Ruth Glass do? London: Aspects of change as a critique of urban epistemologies
Johnson-Schlee, S (2019). What would Ruth Glass do? London: Aspects of change as a critique of urban epistemologies. City. 23 (1), pp. 97-106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2019.1575119