Use of a Virtual Reality device for basic life support training; prototype testing and an exploration of users' views and experience

Journal article


Bench, S., Winter, C. and Francis, G (2019). Use of a Virtual Reality device for basic life support training; prototype testing and an exploration of users' views and experience. Simulation in Healthcare. 14 (5), pp. 287-292. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000387
AuthorsBench, S., Winter, C. and Francis, G
Abstract

Introduction
Immediate initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation significantly increases the chances of survival after a cardiac arrest. Virtual reality devices allow the integration of features of real patients into training to facilitate interaction and feedback, thus improving performance. However, its use as a training tool remains under explored. The aim of this study was to undertake initial testing of a virtual reality basic life support prototype and to explore users’ views and experiences.
Methods
We recruited 23 adult staff members working at a Central London University in England and exposed them to a five-minute virtual reality experience. Each participant completed a pre and post questionnaire and took part in a focus group discussion. Quantitative data were descriptively analyzed whilst qualitative data underwent thematic analysis.
Results
Regardless of prior experience of using virtual reality and/or performing basic life support, most participants scored >90% for chest compressions and reported an increase in confidence and competence post experience. Focus group discussions identified four key themes: experience and expectations; performance and feedback; interaction and immersion; potential.
Conclusion
Our study suggests virtual reality is an enjoyable method by which to teach basic life support. Although concerns over the accuracy of the tracking system and the small sample size weaken our conclusions regarding its ability to assess performance, our exploratory data are of value to educators, researchers and policy makers. Future work needs to address our study limitations, consider how virtual reality fits into the broader context of training and attend to accreditation and resource issues.

Keywordsvirtual reality; resuscitation; healthcare; focus groups; survey; simulation
Year2019
JournalSimulation in Healthcare
Journal citation14 (5), pp. 287-292
PublisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkins
ISSN1559-2332
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000387
Web address (URL)https://insights.ovid.com/crossref?an=01266021-201910000-00002
Publication dates
Print01 Oct 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited08 Jul 2019
Accepted30 May 2019
Accepted author manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/86660

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
Accepted manuscript no tables 11.01.2019.docx
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 512
    total views
  • 78
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Overcoming the challenges of recruiting and interviewing research participants following critical illness due to Covid-19.
James, A., Thomas, N. and Bench, S. (2023). Overcoming the challenges of recruiting and interviewing research participants following critical illness due to Covid-19. Nurse Researcher.
Nurses' perceptions of point of care testing in critical care: A cross‐sectional survey
Bench, S. and Lennox, S. (2022). Nurses' perceptions of point of care testing in critical care: A cross‐sectional survey. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12869
Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) at the preanalytical phase for POCT blood gas analysis: proposal for a shared proactive risk analysis model.
Van Hoof V, Bench S, Soto AB, Luppa PP, Malpass A, Schilling UM, Rooney KD, Stretton A and Tintu AN (2022). Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) at the preanalytical phase for POCT blood gas analysis: proposal for a shared proactive risk analysis model. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine. 60 (8). https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2022-0319
Learning from COVID-19: Cross-sectional e-survey of critical care nurses' satisfaction and experiences of their role in the pandemic response across the United Kingdom.
Stayt LC, Bench S, Credland N and Plowright C (2022). Learning from COVID-19: Cross-sectional e-survey of critical care nurses' satisfaction and experiences of their role in the pandemic response across the United Kingdom. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12850
Prevalence of skin pressure injury in critical care patients in the UK: results of a single-day point prevalence evaluation in adult critically ill patients.
Rubulotta F, Brett S, Boulanger C, Blackwood B, Deschepper M, Labeau SO, Blot S, UK Collaborating Site Investigators, DecubICUs study team and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Trials’ Group UK Collaborators and Bench, S. (2022). Prevalence of skin pressure injury in critical care patients in the UK: results of a single-day point prevalence evaluation in adult critically ill patients. BMJ Open. 12 (11), p. e057010. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057010
Patients’ perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness; an interview study
Bench, S., Thomas, N. and James, A. (2022). Patients’ perspectives of recovery after COVID-19 critical illness; an interview study. Nursing in Critical Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.12867
Research behind a webcam: an exploration of virtual interviewing with children and young people.
Bichard, E., McKeever, S., Wray, J. and Bench, S. (2022). Research behind a webcam: an exploration of virtual interviewing with children and young people. Nurse Researcher. 30 (4), pp. 39-46. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2022.e1857
‘Doing the best we can’: Registered Nurses' experiences and perceptions of patient safety in intensive care during COVID-19
Stayt, L.C., Merriman, C., Bench, S., Price, A.M., Vollam, S., Walthall, H., Credland, N., Gerber, K. and Calovski, V. (2022). ‘Doing the best we can’: Registered Nurses' experiences and perceptions of patient safety in intensive care during COVID-19. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 78 (10), pp. 3371-3384. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15419
Recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services following critical illness: an updated UK national cross-sectional survey and progress report.
Connolly B, Milton-Cole R, Adams C, Battle C, McPeake J, Quasim T, Silversides J, Slack A, Waldmann C, Wilson E, Meyer J, Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine Life After Critical Illness Working Group and Bench, S. (2021). Recovery, rehabilitation and follow-up services following critical illness: an updated UK national cross-sectional survey and progress report. BMJ Open. 11, p. e052214. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052214
Education provision for patients following a spinal cord injury
Rodger, S and Bench, S. (2019). Education provision for patients following a spinal cord injury. British Journal of Nursing. 28 (6), pp. 377-381. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2019.28.6.377
A rapid review of educational preparedness of advanced clinical practitioners.
Dover N, Lee GA, Raleigh M, Baker EJ, Starodub R, Bench S and Garry B (2019). A rapid review of educational preparedness of advanced clinical practitioners. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14105
Orthopaedic nurses' engagement in clinical research; an exploration of ideas, facilitators and challenges.
Bench S, Dowie-Baker JA and Fish P (2019). Orthopaedic nurses' engagement in clinical research; an exploration of ideas, facilitators and challenges. International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing. 35, p. 100699. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijotn.2019.04.002
The effect of mannequin fidelity on the achievement of learning outcomes for nursing, midwifery and allied healthcare practitioners: Systematic review and meta-analysis
Sherwood, RJ and Francis, G (2018). The effect of mannequin fidelity on the achievement of learning outcomes for nursing, midwifery and allied healthcare practitioners: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today. 69, pp. 81-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.025