Back to live: Returning to in-person engagement with arts and culture in the Liverpool City Region

Journal article


Anisimovich, A., Chapple, M., Worsley, J., Watkins, M., Billington, J. and Balabanova, E. (2022). Back to live: Returning to in-person engagement with arts and culture in the Liverpool City Region. Frontiers in Psychology Sec. Health Psychology. 13 (1011766). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011766
AuthorsAnisimovich, A., Chapple, M., Worsley, J., Watkins, M., Billington, J. and Balabanova, E.
Abstract

On July 19th 2021, the UK government lifted the COVID-19 restrictions that had been in place since March 2020, including wearing masks, social distancing, and all other legal requirements. The return to in-person events has been slow and gradual, showing that audiences are still cautious when (and if) they resume engaging in arts and culture. Patterns of audience behavior have also changed, shifting toward local attendance, greater digital and hybrid engagement, and openness to event format changes. As the arts and cultural industry recovers from the pandemic, it is important to adopt an audience-oriented approach and look at the changing patterns of engaging in arts and culture. This study aims to better understand the impact of the pandemic on the patterns of cultural and arts engagement. Eight qualitative interviews were conducted to explore the changes in arts and cultural engagement since the restrictions were lifted, focusing particularly on the audience’s experiences of returning to in-person arts and cultural events in the Liverpool City Region (LCR). Using framework analysis, three themes were identified from the data: The new normal: reframing pre-pandemic and pandemic experiences of arts and culture, Re-adjusting to in-person provision, and Moving forward: online and blended provision. The findings show that the pandemic altered the ways that people engage in arts and culture. The “new normal,” a blend of pandemic and pre-pandemic experiences, illustrates how the pandemic has highlighted and reconfigured the importance of arts and culture, in terms of personal and cultural identity. Resuming in-person engagement after a long break, participants noted that they were able to feel more like themselves again. Arts and culture were perceived to be beneficial in rebuilding personal resilience and confidence. Engaging in arts and culture, following the isolating experience of the pandemic, has also helped participants feel reconnected to others through their shared experiences. Finally, the findings suggest that online provision remains vital for many, ensuring wider inclusivity, particularly for vulnerable audiences. At the same time, it is important to acknowledge the barriers to online inclusion and the possibility of this resulting in a growing digital divide.

Keywordsarts engagement, COVID-19, cultural industry, mental health, wellbeing, digital provision
Year2022
JournalFrontiers in Psychology Sec. Health Psychology
Journal citation13 (1011766)
PublisherFrontiers Media
ISSN1664-1078
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011766
Web address (URL)https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1011766/full?&utm_source=Email_to_authors_&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=T1_11.5e1_author&utm_campaign=Email_publication&field=&journalName=Frontiers_in_Psychology&id=1011766
Publication dates
Online26 Oct 2022
Publication process dates
Accepted10 Oct 2022
Deposited07 Nov 2022
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/9269v

Download files


Publisher's version
fpsyg-13-1011766.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 4
    total views
  • 2
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Beyond the sentence: Shared reading within a high secure hospital
Watkins, M., Naylor, K. and Corcoran, R. Beyond the sentence: Shared reading within a high secure hospital. Front. Psychol. Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings. 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1015498
Supporting researchers conducting qualitative research into sensitive, challenging, and difficult topics: Experiences and practical applications.
Silverio, S.A., Sheen, K.S., Bramante, A., Knighting, K., Koops, T.U., Montgomery, E., November, L., Soulsby, L.K., Stevenson, J.H., Watkins, M., Easter, A. and Sandall, J. (2022). Supporting researchers conducting qualitative research into sensitive, challenging, and difficult topics: Experiences and practical applications. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 21, pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221124739
Regional innovation in arts provision spawned by COVID-19: ‘It became a lifeline for a lot of people who are stuck at home’
Worsley, J.D., Billington, J., Balabanova, E. and Watkins, M. (2022). Regional innovation in arts provision spawned by COVID-19: ‘It became a lifeline for a lot of people who are stuck at home’. Frontiers in Public Health, section Public Mental Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.753973
Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient–public involvement contributors
Paddock, K., Woolfall, K., Frith, L., Watkins, M., Gamble, C., Welters, I. and Young, B. (2020). Strategies to enhance recruitment and consent to intensive care studies: a qualitative study with researchers and patient–public involvement contributors. BMJ Open. 11: e048193 (9). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048193
Shame and the psychosis continuum: A systematic review of the literature
Carden, L.J., Saini, P., Seddon, C., Watkins, M. and Taylor, P.J. (2020). Shame and the psychosis continuum: A systematic review of the literature. Psychology & Psychotherapy: Theory, Research & Practice. 93 (1), pp. 160-186. https://doi.org/10.1111/papt.12204
Quantitative Methods
Billington, J., Corcoran, R., Watkins, M., Steenberg, M., Christiansen, C., Ladegaard, N. and Kuiken, D. (2019). Quantitative Methods. in: Billington, J. (ed.) Reading and Mental Health Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. pp. 265-292
A systematic review of evidence on the impacts of joint decision-making on community wellbeing
Pennington, A., Watkins, M., Bagnall, A., South, J. and Corcoran, R. (2018). A systematic review of evidence on the impacts of joint decision-making on community wellbeing. London What Works Centre for Wellbeing.