Quality assurance of multiple-choice tests

Journal article


Bush, M (2006). Quality assurance of multiple-choice tests. Quality Assurance in Education. 14 (4), pp. 398 - 404. https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610703974
AuthorsBush, M
Abstract

Purpose
– To provide educationalists with an understanding of the key quality issues relating to multiple‐choice tests, and a set of guidelines for the quality assurance of such tests.

Design/methodology/approach
– The discussion of quality issues is structured to reflect the order in which those issues naturally arise. It covers the design of individual multiple‐choice questions, issues relating to the question bank as a whole, choice of test format, and what can be learned through post‐test analysis. The paper offers practical advice, with an emphasis on maximising test reliability.

Findings
– It is recognised that considerable expertise and effort is required to undertake a thorough post‐test statistical analysis, but pre‐test quality assurance is relatively straightforward, if labour‐intensive. The question of which is best amongst the various alternative test formats is left open.

Originality/value
– The general issue of quality assurance of multiple‐choice tests is surely an important one, yet the author is not aware of any other publication that deals directly with this topic.

Year2006
JournalQuality Assurance in Education
Journal citation14 (4), pp. 398 - 404
PublisherEmerald
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1108/09684880610703974
Publication dates
Print01 Jan 2006
Publication process dates
Deposited14 Feb 2017
Accepted author manuscript
License
Permalink -

https://openresearch.lsbu.ac.uk/item/87qxy

Download files


Accepted author manuscript
QA of MC Tests ACCEPTED.doc
License: CC BY 4.0

  • 353
    total views
  • 180
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 5
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

Addressing the shortcomings of traditional multiple-choice tests: subset selection without mark deductions
Otoyo, L and Bush, M (2018). Addressing the shortcomings of traditional multiple-choice tests: subset selection without mark deductions. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation. 23 (1).
Reducing the need for guesswork in multiple-choice tests
Bush, M (2014). Reducing the need for guesswork in multiple-choice tests. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 40 (2), pp. 218 - 231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.902192
A multiple choice test that rewards partial knowledge
Bush, M (2001). A multiple choice test that rewards partial knowledge. Journal of Further and Higher Education. 25 (2), pp. 157 - 163. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098770120050828
Numerically-analysed Multiwavelet Transform computations: multidimensional compression case studies
Alramahi, N, Bush, M and Swash, R (2017). Numerically-analysed Multiwavelet Transform computations: multidimensional compression case studies. International Conference on Communication, Management and Information Technology. Warsaw, Poland 03 - 05 Apr 2017
Novel 3D Stereoscopic Film Compression using Multiwavelet
Alramahi, N, Bush, M and Swash, R (2017). Novel 3D Stereoscopic Film Compression using Multiwavelet. International Conference on Communication, Management and Information Technology. Warsaw, Poland 03 - 05 Apr 2017
Coding and Decoding Stereoscopic Film Compression by Multiwavelet Transform
Alramahi, N, Bush, M and Swash, R (2017). Coding and Decoding Stereoscopic Film Compression by Multiwavelet Transform. International Conference on Communication, Management and Information Technology. Warsaw, Poland 03 - 05 Apr 2017
Size Optimization of 3D Stereoscopic Film Frames
Alramahi, N and Bush, M (2017). Size Optimization of 3D Stereoscopic Film Frames. International Conference on Communication, Management and Information Technology. Warsaw, Poland 03 - 05 Apr 2017